Reading the article State to issue plan on Raila security by Cyrus Ombati, I was surprised to read that Raila and Kalonzo had 80 guards between them. However, given the insecurity in Kenya, these 80 guards were allocated for a reason.
Some argue that Raila and Kalonzo are now civilians and are no longer in need of security. I disagree given the nature of the positions they held, and the associated risks. If security detail is to be reduced, it should be consistent, all previous leaders in the same postion, should get the same treatment.
Moody Awori has security in Nairobi, and Busia(a precedent has been set here), as does Moi and Kibaki.
Why should Raila and Kalonzo be any different, as they were in government.
We can argue that it is taxpayers money, and our money needs to go elsewhere.
Fair enough, the powers that be need to be consistent, in the decisions they make, or it is discrimination, plain and simple.
Quotes from the article below
The Government is today expected to issue a circular on the management of security seconded to former Prime Minister Raila Odinga and former Vice-President Kalonzo Musyoka.
Head of Public Service Francis Kimemia is set to issue guidelines on how the armed men will operate and the resources they are supposed to have.
Apparently, Raila and Kalonzo had discussed the issue of their security when they met President Uhuru Kenyatta and his deputy, William Ruto. It was then that it was agreed the two should retain a good number of security for their safety and hence the expected circular.
Coalition for Reforms and Democracy ( CORD) Senators and MPs raised concerns over the withdrawal of the two leaders’ security detail and demanded an explanation, terming it an attempt to humiliate the former leaders.
Update related article: Raila's security request rejected
Quotes below
Some argue that Raila and Kalonzo are now civilians and are no longer in need of security. I disagree given the nature of the positions they held, and the associated risks. If security detail is to be reduced, it should be consistent, all previous leaders in the same postion, should get the same treatment.
Moody Awori has security in Nairobi, and Busia(a precedent has been set here), as does Moi and Kibaki.
Why should Raila and Kalonzo be any different, as they were in government.
We can argue that it is taxpayers money, and our money needs to go elsewhere.
Fair enough, the powers that be need to be consistent, in the decisions they make, or it is discrimination, plain and simple.
Quotes from the article below
The Government is today expected to issue a circular on the management of security seconded to former Prime Minister Raila Odinga and former Vice-President Kalonzo Musyoka.
Head of Public Service Francis Kimemia is set to issue guidelines on how the armed men will operate and the resources they are supposed to have.
Apparently, Raila and Kalonzo had discussed the issue of their security when they met President Uhuru Kenyatta and his deputy, William Ruto. It was then that it was agreed the two should retain a good number of security for their safety and hence the expected circular.
Coalition for Reforms and Democracy ( CORD) Senators and MPs raised concerns over the withdrawal of the two leaders’ security detail and demanded an explanation, terming it an attempt to humiliate the former leaders.
Update related article: Raila's security request rejected
Quotes below
The Jubilee government has turned down Raila Odinga's request that he should get a security detail of up to 20 police officers.
Deputy President William Ruto communicated the decision to the former Prime Minister last week when the two met privately at Ruto's Karen house.
During the meeting, Raila reportedly reminded Ruto that Jubilee had promised that it would increase his personal security along with former Vice President Kalonzo Musyoka.
Raila and Kalonzo were assigned close to 100 police officers during the last government but they were withdrawn, along with their government vehicles, shortly after President Uhuru Kenyatta was sworn in on April 9.
A few police officers continued guarding them but without clear guidelines.
Raila and Kalonzo met Uhuru and Ruto at State House on April 13 to express concern over their security and government promised to issue a directive.
Head of Public Service Francis Kimemia was expected to issue guidelines on how many men and resources their security details would have.
However there has been no communication from the government since then. According to sources, this prompted Raila to meet Ruto again to request an enhanced security detail of up to 20 police officers working in shifts.
Ruto, according to insiders, said 20 officers was too high but said that Jubilee government would honor the VIP status of Raila and Kalonzo with no further elaboration.
There is no law clearly providing for how a former PM and VP should be treated. Both Raila and Kalonzo missed out when President Kibaki rejected the Retirement Benefits (Deputy President and Designated State Officers) Bill 2013 in January.
Kibaki rejected the Bill because of the huge retirement packages that MPs had awarded themselves just before the end of the last Parliament.
Retired Presidents Daniel Moi and Mwai Kibaki are both well catered for under the Presidential Retirements Benefits Act.
The Act gives a retired president 12 security officers- six for his own personal security and six others to guard his Nairobi and rural homes.
In the April meeting with Uhuru and Ruto, it was suggested that the two Cord leaders be each accorded 12 police officers like Moi and Kibaki.
Insiders within Jubilee said that Raila and Kalonzo would first have to quit active politics before they can enjoy such benefits.
“Even before the enactment of a law, this can easily be done through a circular by the head of public service. But what we know is that such retirement benefits cannot be extended to a person one who is still active in politics,” said a source at the Office of the President yesterday.
The Presidential Retirements Benefits Act provides that that a former president will lose all his benefits if he engages in active politics.
The bill rejected by Kibaki provided that “an entitled person shall not hold office in any political party at any time.” Raila and Kalonzo have indicated that they will continue leading the opposition from outside Parliament. Raila is still the ODM leader while Kalonzo continue to serve as the leader of Wiper Party.
The Bill had also provided that a person entitled to retirement benefits “may be requested by the Government to perform specific official functions and shall be paid a reasonable allowance in respect of such official functions.” On Sunday, Raila stated that he is not ready to take up any job assigned to him by President Uhuru.
Deputy President William Ruto communicated the decision to the former Prime Minister last week when the two met privately at Ruto's Karen house.
During the meeting, Raila reportedly reminded Ruto that Jubilee had promised that it would increase his personal security along with former Vice President Kalonzo Musyoka.
Raila and Kalonzo were assigned close to 100 police officers during the last government but they were withdrawn, along with their government vehicles, shortly after President Uhuru Kenyatta was sworn in on April 9.
A few police officers continued guarding them but without clear guidelines.
Raila and Kalonzo met Uhuru and Ruto at State House on April 13 to express concern over their security and government promised to issue a directive.
Head of Public Service Francis Kimemia was expected to issue guidelines on how many men and resources their security details would have.
However there has been no communication from the government since then. According to sources, this prompted Raila to meet Ruto again to request an enhanced security detail of up to 20 police officers working in shifts.
Ruto, according to insiders, said 20 officers was too high but said that Jubilee government would honor the VIP status of Raila and Kalonzo with no further elaboration.
There is no law clearly providing for how a former PM and VP should be treated. Both Raila and Kalonzo missed out when President Kibaki rejected the Retirement Benefits (Deputy President and Designated State Officers) Bill 2013 in January.
Kibaki rejected the Bill because of the huge retirement packages that MPs had awarded themselves just before the end of the last Parliament.
Retired Presidents Daniel Moi and Mwai Kibaki are both well catered for under the Presidential Retirements Benefits Act.
The Act gives a retired president 12 security officers- six for his own personal security and six others to guard his Nairobi and rural homes.
In the April meeting with Uhuru and Ruto, it was suggested that the two Cord leaders be each accorded 12 police officers like Moi and Kibaki.
Insiders within Jubilee said that Raila and Kalonzo would first have to quit active politics before they can enjoy such benefits.
“Even before the enactment of a law, this can easily be done through a circular by the head of public service. But what we know is that such retirement benefits cannot be extended to a person one who is still active in politics,” said a source at the Office of the President yesterday.
The Presidential Retirements Benefits Act provides that that a former president will lose all his benefits if he engages in active politics.
The bill rejected by Kibaki provided that “an entitled person shall not hold office in any political party at any time.” Raila and Kalonzo have indicated that they will continue leading the opposition from outside Parliament. Raila is still the ODM leader while Kalonzo continue to serve as the leader of Wiper Party.
The Bill had also provided that a person entitled to retirement benefits “may be requested by the Government to perform specific official functions and shall be paid a reasonable allowance in respect of such official functions.” On Sunday, Raila stated that he is not ready to take up any job assigned to him by President Uhuru.
No comments:
Post a Comment